Who is Liberty?

Racism and Libertarianism Time To Fight For What’s Right Part 1

Posted in happiness, nationalism, Racism by Christopher Sarda on February 25, 2011

In this quest to find out who or what liberty is and how much or how little is best I often run into small problems when I apply them to real world issues. A lot of what’s read on this blog will seem to be libertarian (not Glenn Beck libertarian I hope, more Robert Nozick). I can say that there are many things that annoy me about libertarians, the libertarian party and especially the ‘The Tea Party’.

Today is one of those days where I’m going to hang to people that are ‘liberty minded’ like myself and to a certain degree side with the dreaded socialists. The topic is racism and civil rights.

Their racism is hidden behind abstract ideas like traditional values, the national religion and even small government.


Not taking into account the tax system, the power of the state and a myriad of other political and economical issues, historically and generally, when it comes to civil tights the socialists have been correct. The conservative forces that have historically fueled segregation, racial nationalism, minority oppression, slavery and a lot prejudice in general have been shown by history to be wrong.

They’re hidden behind abstract ideas like traditional values, the national religion (or at least the contemporary understanding of the national religion), and even small government. When a politician says they are for preserving traditional values, a bell should ring in your head that the man or woman before you is supporting an idea too general to analyze or criticize and therefore is at best saying nothing of importance and at worst is using the phrase to mask another agenda. Often times that agenda has been nationalism or racism. The national religion idea is simply a falsehood, it’s the cousin of traditional values.

When the situation calls for a more secular tone, a partisan person only has to replace the phrase: “my religion” with the phrase: “traditional values.” Hiding prejudice ideals behind the banner of small government is the one that irks someone like me the most, the use of the idea of a smaller less intrusive state (or in the U.S. the idea of states’ rights) to advance oppressive ideals is the dirtiest form of hiding one’s prejudice.

It’s a testament to how far we’ve progressed as a society that the thought that a state in the US would try to limit the freedom of an African American on the grounds that it’s a “free state” and it should be allowed to oppress other human being independent of the federal government is now thought of as crazy. At least it sounds like a crazy argument to me, maybe not so much to you.

There’s so much more to say on the issue and I’ll continue with separate posts going into anti-racist movements and their compatibility with the liberty minded, how the right hijacks Martin Luther King Jr’s movement but does nothing to advance the very liberty oriented cause, and few other subtopics I’ve been mulling over. My main point is to emphasize that any oppression of any group is not who liberty is.

No duh right?

Advertisements

Plaxico Burress and His Evil Gun

Posted in happiness, Protecting Yourself by Christopher Sarda on January 8, 2010

“The defendant took an unholstered, loaded pistol into a crowded nightclub, accidentally firing it with one hand while holding his drink in the other,” he said. “This extreme and reckless disregard for safety is what New York’s gun laws were designed to prevent.”  This is was said by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. according to espn.com

Mr. Vance unfortunately definitely isn’t Liberty.  It interests me that New York’s gun laws are designed for ‘prevention’.  They obviously don’t work.  New York City is one of the most dangerous places in the US, and Mr. Burress, although an idiot, is someone who’s an actual earner in this little country of ours, not some criminal mastermind or drunken hooligan.

So this is basically what happens.  A state has draconian gun laws in order to protect its citizens.  Yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the country and Mr. Burress, who really should have known he was in totalitarian state, had a gun to protect: himself.  For this an earner, someone who made peoples lives better with his skills, someone who did his part to make our country’s favorite game better, now goes from giving hundreds of thousands of dollars into the system, to costing us a hundred thousand dollars to house in a prison.

And all the while, the NY district attorney says that New York’s gun laws are there to prevent gun crime!  Plaxico should be held responsible for anything that could have gone wrong, but the point is that New York laws designed to prevent gun crime in the name safety, didn’t prevent anything at all and all the public got in return was an expense rather than an account receivable.

I do know a DA that got himself some press and maybe a nomination as a democratic candidate in the future though.

Tagged with: , ,